Experts in Aesthetic Value Practices

Author:

Lopes Dominic McIver1

Affiliation:

1. University of British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Work on aesthetic value appeals to expertise in three different ways. On traditional approaches, expert aesthetic judges either provide authoritative access to aesthetic value or they constitute it. On a third, new approach, aesthetic values are relative to social practices, and aesthetic expertise determines which practices are the ones that we belong to. Aesthetic experts, on this approach, are neither guides to aesthetic value nor those whose responses constitute aesthetic value. This paper offers a defence of this innovative third approach to the relationship between aesthetic value and aesthetic expertise.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference56 articles.

1. Aesthetic supervenience vs aesthetic grounding.;Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics,2012

2. Bhattacharyya, K. C. (2011[1930]) “The concept of rasa,” in Indian Philosophy in English: From Renaissance to Independence, (eds.), Nalini Bhushan and Jay L. Garfield, 195–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Gustave Caillebotte, French impressionism, and mere exposure.;Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,2003

4. The concept of an aesthetic property,;Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3