Freedom and Financial Market Reform

Author:

Preiss Joshua

Abstract

Abstract The argument in this chapter is a simple one, but with major implications for freedom and markets and the ends of financial market reform. Drawing upon both political philosophy and economic history, it argues that economic freedom depends on the accountability of institutions that structure individual market choices. Failure to recognize this fact gives license to concentrations of political and economic power and exacerbates principal–agent problems, creating firms that are often too big to fail, and an industry whose regulation is often too complex to enforce. These trends virtually guarantee the outsourcing of one of the central tasks of government in a free society: the creation and maintenance of institutions that structure markets. Freedom-minded financial market reform should be directed at a simpler and more narrow banking and regulatory system that counters the ways in which complexity, instability, power and information asymmetries, and regulatory capture make people less free.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference78 articles.

1. Good Banking Regulation Needs Clear Focus, Sensible Tools, and Political Will.;International Centre for Financial Regulation Research Paper,2011

2. Alessandri, Piergiorgio, and Andrew Haldane. 2009. Banking on the State. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Twelfth Annual International Banking Conference, “The International Financial Crisis: Have the Rules of Finance Changed?” Chicago, September 25, 2009. https://www.bis.org/review/r091111e.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3