Author:
Rodríguez-Alegría Enrique
Abstract
Abstract
A study of the probate inventories compared the net worth of each inventory with the origin of the different items in it. It provides empirical data that challenge the idea that wealthier colonizers consumed European and Asian imports, while poorer colonizers could only purchase local, Indigenous goods. In fact, there is no correlation between wealth and patterns of consumption of imported or Indigenous goods. There is a stronger correlation between consumption of imported items and time: toward the end of the sixteenth century, as trade became regular and reliable, all colonizers began using more European goods, regardless of their wealth. Further, Indigenous goods could sometimes be more expensive than European imports, depending on their quality and other factors. This chapter challenges the idea that class determines consumption, and it emphasizes people’s choices, power, social strategies, and social connections in shaping consumption and the material world.
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York
Reference393 articles.
1. Acuto, Félix A. 2005 The Materiality of Inka Domination: Landscape, Spectacle, Memory, and Ancestors. In Global Archaeological Theory: Contextual Voices and Contemporary Thoughts, edited by Pedro Paulo Funari, Andrés Zarankin, and Emily Stovel, pp. 211–236. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.
2. Aguilera, Carmen 1985 Mueble Prehispánico. In El mueble mexicano. Historia, evolución e influencias, edited by Aguilera, Carmen, Elisa Vargas Lugo, Marita Martínez del Río de Redo, Jorge Loyzaga, Luis Ortiz Macedo, Teresa Castelló Iturbide, Manuel Carballo, Ma. Cecilia Martínez López, and Fernando Sánchez Martínez, pp. 13–24. Fondo Cultural Banamex, Mexico City.