Fleeing conflict to safety

Author:

Heys Alicia

Abstract

Abstract This chapter considers those who have fled conflict and come to the UK but who have not experienced modern slavery, reflecting on whether they remained safe because of UK government policies, or despite them. Two methods are highlighted through which the respondents who did not experience modern slavery were kept safe from it: the support of the government and statutory agencies, and the support of strangers and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). While discussions of the former exemplify ways in which government structures can be successful in identifying and protecting potentially vulnerable people, discussions of the latter relate to situations in which those systems can fail and whereby the respondents remained safe only through interventions by strangers or NGOs.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference349 articles.

1. Victims or Survivors?;Avicenna Journal of Medicine,2016

2. Allain, J., K. Bales, A. Bunting, J. Cairns, W. M. Carter Jr, H. Cullen, S. Drescher, S. Engerman, P. Finkelman, B. Freamon, A. Gorsuch, R. Helmholz, R. Hickey, A. Honoré, A. McQuade, O. Patterson, J. Penner, J. Quirk, J. Sarich, and R. Scott. 2012. ‘Bellagio-Harvard Guidelines on the Legal Parameters of Slavery’. In The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historic to the Contemporary, edited by J. Allain, pp. 375–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3