Author:
von Mengden Ferdinand,Schneider Britta
Abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates two parallel, conflicting and yet interdependent, discursive traits on human language all through the nineteenth century and beyond. One – empirically grounded in the Comparative Method as a scientific tool – is the growing awareness of the historicity and the fluidity of language. At the same time, the discursive construction of bounded and homogeneous national languages was an essential ideological requirement for the political nation building process in Europe. We identify the seeds of both lines of thinking in the writings of Johann Gottfried Herder at the beginning of a long nineteenth century and we see both of them struggling in the sometimes idiosyncratic reasoning of Ferdinand de Saussure’s Cours at the end of it. The underlying methodological nationalism, we conclude, has prevailed in pre- and post-Saussurean linguistic theory and methodology up until today.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference984 articles.
1. Act of 6 January 2005 on national and ethnic minorities and on the regional languages, http://ksng.gugik.gov.pl/english/files/act_on_national_minorities.pdf (accessed 08.02.2018).
2. Adams, George Brendan. 1975. Hamito-Semitic and pre-Celtic substratum in Ireland and Britain. In James Bynon and Theodora Bynon (eds.), Hamito-Semitica. The Hague: Mouton: 233–247.