Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To assess the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) on patients with fibromyalgia in terms of pain intensity, fibromyalgia impact, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing. Methods A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with RStudio software (RStudio, Boston, MA) for relevant outcomes and were pooled in a meta-analysis with the random effects model. Results A total of eight studies were included. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences in pain intensity with a moderate clinical effect in seven studies at the post-intervention assessment (SMD: –0.76; 95% CI: –1.33 to –0.19; P < 0.05) with evidence of significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05, I2 = 92%), but it did not show statistically significant differences in fibromyalgia impact, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing (P > 0.05). With regard to the follow-up assessment, only the fibromyalgia impact showed significant improvements, with a very small clinical effect in nine studies (SMD: –0.44; 95% CI: –0.73 to –0.14; P < 0.05) and evidence of significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05, I2 = 80%). After the application of a sensitivity analysis with the PNE face-to-face interventions, the meta-analysis showed a significant decrease in pain intensity, with a moderate clinical effect at the post-intervention and follow-up assessments without evidence of significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05, I2 = 10%). Conclusions There is low-quality evidence that in patients with fibromyalgia, PNE can decrease the pain intensity in the post-intervention period and the fibromyalgia impact in the follow-up period. However, it appears that PNE showed no effect on anxiety and pain catastrophizing.