Pulmonary artery catheter use and in-hospital outcomes in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Rong Lisa Q1ORCID,Luhmann Grant1,Di Franco Antonino2ORCID,Dimagli Arnaldo2,Perry Luke A34,Martinez Andrew P1,Demetres Michelle5ORCID,Mazer C David67,Bellomo Rinaldo489ORCID,Gaudino Mario2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine , New York, NY, USA

2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine , New York, NY, USA

3. Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital , Melbourne, VIC, Australia

4. Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC, Australia

5. Samuel J. Wood Library and C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Centre, Weill Cornell Medicine , New York, NY, USA

6. Departments of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital , Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON, Canada

8. Department of Intensive Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital , Melbourne, VIC, Australia

9. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University , Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES To determine the association of intraoperative pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use with in-hospital outcomes in cardiac surgical patients. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library (Wiley) databases were screened for studies that compared cardiac surgical patients receiving intraoperative PAC with controls and reporting in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay, cost of hospitalization, fluid volume administered, intubation time, inotropes use, acute kidney injury (AKI), stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and infections. RESULTS Seven studies (25 853 patients, 88.6% undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery) were included. In-hospital mortality was significantly increased with PAC use [odds ratio (OR) 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–2.20, P = 0.04]; PAC use was also associated with greater intraoperative inotrope use (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.54–4.41) and costs [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.20; 95% CI 0.16–0.23], longer intensive care unit stay (SMD = 0.29; 95% CI 0.25–0.33), and longer intubation time (SMD = 0.44; 95% CI 0.12–0.76). CONCLUSIONS PAC use is associated with significantly increased odds of in-hospital mortality, but the amount and quality of the available evidence is limited. Prospective randomized trials testing the effect of PAC on the outcomes of cardiac surgical patients are urgently needed.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3