Sevoflurane provides better haemodynamic stability than propofol during right ventricular ischaemia–reperfusion

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES To assess whether sevoflurane provides better haemodynamic stability than propofol in acute right ventricular (RV) ischaemia–reperfusion. METHODS Open-chest pigs (mean ± standard deviation, 68.8 ± 4.2 kg) anaesthetized with sevoflurane (n = 6) or propofol (n = 6) underwent 60 min of RV free wall ischaemia and 150 min of reperfusion. Haemodynamic parameters and blood flow in the 3 major coronary arteries were continuously monitored. Biomarkers of cardiac ischaemia were analysed. RESULTS Mean arterial pressure and stroke volume decreased, whereas pulmonary vascular resistance increased equally in both groups. Heart rate increased 7.5% with propofol (P < 0.05) and 17% with sevoflurane (P < 0.05). At reperfusion, left atrial pressure and systemic vascular resistance decreased with sevoflurane. While RV stroke work (mmHg·ml) and cardiac output (l·min−1) decreased in the propofol group (4.2 ± 1.2 to 2.9 ± 1.7 and 2.65 ± 0.44 to 2.28 ± 0.56, respectively, P < 0.05 both), they recovered to baseline levels in the sevoflurane group (4.1 ± 1.5 to 4.0 ± 1.5 and 2.77 ± 0.6 to 2.6 ± 0.5, respectively, P > 0.05). Circumflex and left anterior descending coronary artery blood flow decreased in both groups. Right coronary artery blood flow (ml·min−1) decreased with propofol (38 ± 9 to 28 ± 9, P < 0.05), but not with sevoflurane (28 ± 11 to 28 ± 17, P > 0.05). Biomarkers of cardiac ischaemia increased in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Compared to propofol, sevoflurane-anaesthetized pigs showed higher RV stroke work, cardiac output and right coronary artery blood flow during reperfusion. These findings warrant a clinical trial of sevoflurane in RV ischaemia in humans.