Comparative analysis of the results of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy simulation using the three-dimensional-printed Biotexture wet-lung model and surgeons’ experience

Author:

Tanaka Takahiko1,Shimada Yoshihisa,Furumoto Hideyuki1,Makino Yojiro1,Kudo Yujin1ORCID,Maehara Sachio1,Hagiwara Masaru1,Kakihana Masatoshi1,Kajiwara Naohiro1,Ohira Tatsuo1,Ikeda Norihiko1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES We performed a comparative analysis of the performance of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy simulation using three-dimensional-printed Biotexture lung models by surgeons classified according to their level of expertise. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between surgeons’ experience and time to complete the VATS lobectomy simulation. METHODS Participants were divided into 3 groups: group A included those who had no experience of actual VATS lobectomy (n = 11), group B included those who had performed 5–10 VATS lobectomies (n = 12) and group C included those who had performed >100 VATS lobectomies (n = 6). Their performances were assessed based on total procedure time, duration to the exposure of the vessels, ligation of the arteries and stapling of the fissures. After the simulation, a questionnaire survey was performed. RESULTS The median total procedure time was significantly shorter in the group of surgeons with more experience (A vs B, P < 0.001; B vs C, P = 0.034; A vs C, P < 0.001). Regarding ‘the exposure of all the vessels to be resected’ and ‘ligation of the arteries’, group B completed these steps in less time than group A (P = 0.024 and P = 0.012, respectively). In the questionnaire, all groups answered that this simulation was useful for novices to improve their skills. CONCLUSIONS Although time to complete the VATS lobectomy simulation is only a part of evaluation points for real skills, this model can facilitate basic skill acquisitions for novices.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3