Conventional versus rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a single-centre comparison between the Edwards Magna valve and its rapid-deployment successor-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Conventional versus rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a single-centre comparison between the Edwards Magna valve and its rapid-deployment successor

Published:2016-03-13 Issue:6 Volume:22 Page:799-805
ISSN:1569-9293
Container-title:Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg

Author:

Andreas Martin,Wallner Stephanie,Habertheuer Andreas,Rath Claus,Schauperl Martin,Binder Thomas,Beitzke Dietrich,Rosenhek Raphael,Loewe Christian,Wiedemann Dominik,Kocher Alfred,Laufer Guenther

Funder

Edwards Lifesciences

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Surgery

Link

http://academic.oup.com/icvts/article-pdf/22/6/799/16842736/ivw052.pdf

Reference13 articles.

1. Comparable long-term results for porcine and pericardial prostheses after isolated aortic valve replacement;Andreas;Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2014

2. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012)

3. The Ross procedure offers excellent survival compared with mechanical aortic valve replacement in a real-world setting