Comparative spallation performance of silicone versus Tygon extracorporeal circulation tubing

Author:

Ippoliti Francesco1,Piscioneri Fernando1,Sartini Patrizio1,Peruzzi Mariangela23,Domenico Marina Di4,Dannhauser David5ORCID,Rossi Domenico5ORCID,Causa Filippo6,Netti Paolo Antonio56,Miraldi Fabio1,Greco Ernesto1ORCID,Marullo Antonino2ORCID,Iaccarino Alessandra27,Cavarretta Elena23ORCID,Zoccai Giuseppe Biondi23ORCID,Sciarretta Sebastiano28,Frati Giacomo28ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrological, Anesthesiological, and Geriatric Sciences, “Umberto I” Hospital, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

2. Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnology, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

3. Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy

4. Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and General Pathology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy

5. Center for Advanced Biomaterials for Health Care@CRIB, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Naples, Italy

6. Interdisciplinary Research Centre on Biomaterials (CRIB) and Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali e della Produzione Industriale (DICMAPI), Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Naples, Italy

7. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy

8. IRCCS NEUROMED, Pozzilli, IS, Italy

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES Reports ranged from mixed to marginal tubing wear and spallation effects as a complication of roller pumps in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Because the rollers constantly compress part of the tubing, we sought to determine whether circuit materials behave differently under a 3-h simulation of CPB. METHODS Two different tubing materials (silicone and Tygon) were tested with a customized experimental circuit, designed to allow in vitro simulation of CPB with priming volumes, pressures, revolutions per minute and temperatures equivalent to the clinical scenario. Samples were analysed with optical and field-emission scanning electron microscopy. We collected 200-ml fluid samples at 4 different times: before starting the CPB (T0), when the predicted revolutions per minute corresponded to about 2 min of CPB (T1), at 90 min (T2) and at 180 min (T3). At the end of CPB, we harvested 2 samples of tubing. Lastly, optical investigations and field-emission scanning electron microscopy observations were used for qualitative and quantitative analysis of circulating fragments. RESULTS T2 and T3 fluid samples showed more particles than T1 samples. Significant differences in terms of particle numbers were detected: silicone tubing released more fragments per millilitre than Tygon tubing, with both materials releasing particles from 5 to 500 µm. Silicone tubing was associated with a time-dependent increase in small particles released (P = 0.04), whereas this did not apply to large particles or to Tygon tubing. Yet, bootstrap estimates suggested that silicone tubing was associated with the release of more small particles whereas Tygon tubing released more large particles (both P < 0.01). Unlike silicone, Tygon samples taken from the portion of the circuit not subjected to the action of the roller pump did not show any erosion on their surfaces. Samples of both materials taken from the portion subjected to the compression of the roller pump showed signs of significant deterioration. CONCLUSIONS Silicone showed a worse spallation performance than Tygon, thus appearing less safe for more complex surgery of prolonged duration or for patients with a prior cerebral ischaemic event. Additional risk and cost-effectiveness comparisons to determine the potential benefits of one type of tubing material over the other are warranted to further expand our findings.

Funder

Sapienza University of Rome

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3