Superior mesenteric flow pattern during counterpulsation: is simply a shorter balloon the solution for visceral hypoperfusion?

Author:

de Jong Monique M J1,Parise Orlando1,Matteucci Francesco1,Tetta Cecilia1,Maessen Jos G1,Gelsomino Sandro1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, CARIM-School for Cardiovascular Disease, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES We studied the flow pattern in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) during intra-aortic balloon pump support, comparing 2 intra-aortic balloons of 2 different lengths. METHODS Sixteen Landrace pigs (mean weight 84.0 kg ± 6.0) were used in this study. The animals were randomly assigned to 2 groups: group 1 received an 8-Fr, 40-ml standard balloon; group 2 received an 8-Fr, 40-ml short balloon. SMA flow was measured during early, mid- and telediastole. RESULTS The standard balloon led to a reduction in SMA flow in early diastole (P < 0.001), a negative flow in mid-diastole (P < 0.001) and a reincrease in telediastole (P < 0.001). In contrast, in early diastole a significant reduction was observed with the short balloon (P < 0.001), followed by another drop in mid-diastole (P < 0.001), without reaching negative values and by a telediastolic increase (P < 0.001). SMA flows were comparable between balloons during early diastole (P = 0.66), whereas they were higher with the short balloon during mid (P < 0.001) and telediastole (P = 0.02). Overall, the diastolic area was significantly larger when the short balloon was used (P < 0.001). Finally, during counterpulsation, mesenteric resistances increased significantly (P < 0.001), although, with the short balloon, they were lower than with the standard balloon (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Despite better overall mean mesenteric diastolic flow, the short balloon leads to early- and mid-diastolic flow reduction, although to a lesser extent than the standard intra-aortic balloon pump balloon. Our data are a call for improvement in the design of the short balloon.

Funder

XEMEX

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3