A chart review on surgical myocardial debridging in symptomatic patients: a safe procedure with good long-term clinical outcome and coronary computed tomographic angiography results

Abstract

AbstractOBJECTIVESMyocardial bridging is mostly diagnosed as an incidental imaging finding but can result in severe vessel compression and significant clinical adverse complications. Since there is still an ongoing debate when to propose surgical unroofing, we studied a group of patients where this was performed as an isolated procedure.METHODSIn 16 patients (38.9 ± 15.7 years, 75% men) who had surgical unroofing for symptomatic isolated myocardial bridges of the left anterior descending artery, we retrospectively analysed symptomatology, medication, imaging modalities used, operative techniques, complications and long-term outcome. Computed tomographic fractional flow reserve was calculated to understand its potential value for decision-making.RESULTSMost procedures were performed on-pump (75%, mean cardiopulmonary bypass 56.5 ± 27.9 min, mean aortic cross-clamping 36.4 ± 19.7 min). Three patients needed a left internal mammary artery bypass since the artery dived inside the ventricle. There were no major complications or deaths. The mean follow-up was 5.5 years. Although there was a dramatic improvement in symptoms, still 31% experienced atypical chest pain at various moments during follow-up. Postoperative radiological control was performed in 88%, showing no residual compression or recurrent myocardial bridge and patent bypass if performed. All postoperative computed tomographic flow calculations (7) showed a normalization of coronary flow.CONCLUSIONSSurgical unroofing for symptomatic isolated myocardial bridging is a safe procedure. Patient selection remains difficult but introducing standard coronary computed tomographic angiography with flow calculations could be helpful in preoperative decision-making and during follow-up.