Routine versus selective near-infrared spectroscopy-guided shunting during carotid eversion endarterectomy

Author:

Kondov Stoyan1ORCID,Bothe Dominique2,Beyersdorf Friedhelm1,Czerny Martin1,Harloff Andreas2,Pooth Jan-Steffen1,Kaier Klaus3,Schöllhorn Joachim1,Kreibich Maximilian1,Siepe Matthias1,Rylski Bartosz1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany

2. Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany

3. Center for Medical Biometry and Informatics, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany

Abstract

AbstractOBJECTIVESThe aim of this study was to compare outcomes of routine shunting to near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-guided shunting in patients undergoing eversion endarterectomy (EEA) under general anaesthesia.METHODSWe retrospectively evaluated data of all patients undergoing EEA of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in our department from January 2011 until January 2019. Included were patients with EEA of the ICA and the patients were divided into 2 groups: selective-shunting group and routine-shunting group. Patients (i) with patch angioplasty during the surgery, (ii) undergoing surgery for restenosis and (ii) stenosis after radiation therapy, (iii) without recorded regional cerebral oxygen saturation trends, (iv) presenting with an emergency treatment indication and (v) operated upon by residents were excluded. In all patients, EEA was performed in general anaesthesia and under NIRS monitoring. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to compare EEA outcomes after routine shunting to NIRS-guided shunting. Primary end points were defined as perioperative stroke and in-hospital mortality after EEA.RESULTSRoutine and NIRS-guided selective shunting were applied in 340 (34.0%) and 661 (66.0%) patients, respectively. A total of 277 pairs were generated via propensity score matching. Fifty-eight (20.1%) from the selective-shunting group were intraoperatively shunted. Concomitant procedures were more frequently performed in the routine-shunting group [170 (61.4%) vs 47 (17.0%), 180 (65%) vs 101 (36.5%), and 60 (21.7%) vs 6 (2.2%), P < 0.001]. The perioperative stroke rate in the routine-shunting group was higher as well [11 (4.0%) vs 3 (1.1%), P = 0.022]. In-hospital death was overall 0.2% (n = 1). Multivariable logistic regression in the matched patient indicated age (odds ratio 1.050, 95% confidence interval 1.002–1.104, P = 0.046) and routine shunting (odds ratio 2.788, confidence interval 1.119–7.428, P = 0.032) as risk factors for perioperative stroke during EEA of the ICA.CONCLUSIONSWe found that, during EEA of the ICA, under general anaesthesia, NIRS-guided selective shunting was associated with a lower incidence of perioperative stroke than routine shunting.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference37 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3