Suitability of SoToxa® Oral Fluid Screening Over Time: Re-Examination of Drugged Driving in Wisconsin

Author:

Savage Theodore1,Sanders Therese2,Pieters Ryan1,Miles Amy1,Barkholtz Heather13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Forensic Toxicology Section, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 2601 Agriculture Drive, Madison, WI 53718, USA

2. Chemical Testing Section, Bureau of Transportation Safety and Technical Services, Wisconsin Department of Transportation , 3502 Kinsman Boulevard, Madison, WI 53704, USA

3. Pharmaceutical Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 777 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA

Abstract

Abstract Drug-impaired driver detection is a critical element of traffic safety. However, shifting drug use patterns over time and geography may limit the long-term reliability of assay-based screening tools. In this work, we compare qualitative results from the Abbott SoToxa® oral fluid (OF) screening device to Quantisal™ OF and whole blood. Our objective was to examine these three qualitative toxicological approaches, scope applicability of OF collection at the roadside, and compare them with a previous analysis of SoToxa® in Wisconsin. OF specimens were screened with the SoToxa® for six drugs or drug classes including amphetamine, benzodiazepines, cocaine, methamphetamine, opioids and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). OF and blood specimens were collected from 106 participants. Quantisal™ OF and blood specimens were screened for drugs on ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight high-resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC–QToF-HRMS) using a data-independent acquisition mode. UPLC–QToF-HRMS data were compared to comprehensive spectral libraries, and drugs were qualitatively identified. Drug Recognition Expert evaluations were performed, and face sheets submitted for 21 participants in this work. In general, the SoToxa® results were consistent with the combined qualitative results observed in Quantisal™ OF specimens and whole blood specimens. Limitations were uncovered for benzodiazepines, opioids and THC. The SoToxa® benzodiazepine assay has high cutoff concentrations for diazepam and clonazepam, limiting its sensitivity and positive predictive value when considering these drugs. SoToxa® opioid screening did not detect fentanyl, which is increasingly prevalent among drug users. Finally, ∆9-THC and its major metabolite 11-nor-9-carboxy-∆9-THC are lipophilic, limiting partitioning into OF. Despite these limitations, the SoToxa® instrument may be useful in assisting law enforcement with identifying individuals driving under the influence of drugs and establishing probable cause at roadside for making impaired driving arrests. Furthermore, Quantisal™ OF may be useful as screening specimens due to their ease of collection and results consistent with whole blood.

Funder

Wisconsin Department of Transportation Safety, Bureau of Transportation Safety and Technical Services

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Chemical Health and Safety,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,Environmental Chemistry,Analytical Chemistry

Reference41 articles.

1. Results of the 2013–2014 national roadside survey of alcohol and drug use by drivers;Berning;Journal of Drug Addiction, Education, and Eradication,2015

2. Drugs and alcohol: their relative crash risk;Romano;Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,2014

3. The utility of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) measures obtained from oral fluid samples in traffic safety;Romano;Traffic Injury Prevention,2019

4. Strengths and limitations of two cannabis-impaired driving detection methods: a review of the literature;Ginsburg;American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse,2019

5. Countermeasures That Work–Drug-Impaired Driving. U.S. Department of Transportation/National Highway Traffic Safety Administration;Smither,2021

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3