Affiliation:
1. Lund University, Sweden
2. Osprey Court, United States
3. Institute of Analytics and Data Science and Department of Government, University of Essex, United Kingdom
Abstract
Abstract
Why do some foreign ministers stay longer in office than others? Are they punished when the country loses a war? Several scholars have focused on the tenure of leaders as an important predictor of foreign policy outcomes, such as war onset, creating an interest in leadership survival. We here shift the focus to the survival of other important politicians in cabinet—foreign ministers, hypothesizing that their tenure depends on their performance in office. For example, we expect that foreign ministers stay longer in office when the country experiences an armed conflict resulting in a win or in a compromise agreement. We evaluate and find support for several of our hypotheses using an original historical dataset, which comprises all foreign ministers of the world's thirteen great powers from the early modern period to the present, covering about 1,100 foreign minister-terms of office.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference54 articles.
1. The Length of Ministerial Tenure in the UK, 1945–1997;Berlinski;British Journal of Political Scienc,2007
2. Individual and Collective Ministerial Performance and the Tenure of Ministers in the UK 1945–1997;Berlinski;Journal of Politics,2010
3. Maddison Project Database. ‘Rebasing `Maddison’: New Income Comparisons and the Shape of Long-run Economic Development’;Bolt,2018
4. Time Is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science;Box-Steffensmeier;American Journal of Political Science,1997
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献