Neurodevelopmental assessments used to measure preschoolers’ cognitive development in Latin America: a systematic review

Author:

Williams Meagan E1ORCID,Corn Elizabeth A1ORCID,Martinez Ransanz Santiago12ORCID,Berl Madison M13ORCID,Andringa-Seed Regan1ORCID,Mulkey Sarah B145ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Prenatal Pediatrics Institute, Children’s National Hospital , Washington, DC, United States

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences , Washington, DC, United States

3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences , Washington, DC, United States

4. Department of Neurology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences , Washington, DC, United States

5. Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences , Washington, DC, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to systematically review the standardized neurodevelopmental assessments used to study preschool-aged children’s cognitive development in Spanish-speaking Latin America. Methods The authors systematically searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and ERIC databases for peer-reviewed articles from Spanish-speaking Latin American countries. Articles were included if they measured cognitive development among children aged 2–6 years using at least one standardized assessment tool; 97 articles were included and reviewed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to assess their use of these tools. Results Ninety-seven studies across 13 countries used a total of 41 assessments to measure cognitive development; most widely used were the Wechsler intelligence scales (n = 46/97), particularly the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (n = 23 and 29, respectively). Other common assessments included the McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities (n = 9), Raven’s Progressive Matrices (n = 9), Child Neuropsychological Assessment (n = 8), and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (n = 7). In regions where normative data for a given assessment were unpublished, authors commonly used norms from the United States, Mexico, or Spain or did not report standard scores in their analyses. Conclusions The wide range of tools used in these studies presents a challenge for generalizing results when measuring the neurodevelopment of Latin American preschool-aged children. The low availability of normative data for specific regions reveals concerns if some tools are culturally and linguistically appropriate even when Spanish is a common language, particularly in low-resource settings. Future work to forge greater consistency in the use of validated measures, clarity in reporting research methods, and publication of regional normative data would benefit the field.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

DC Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center

Thrasher Research Fund

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3