Systematic Review of Instruments Assessing Psychosocial Adaptation and Outcomes Among Families of Children With Congenital Heart Disease

Abstract

Abstract Objective This systematic review identified instruments quantitatively assessing psychosocial adaptation and outcomes in families of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and evaluated instrument psychometrics. Methods Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and a prospectively registered protocol, electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS) were searched from inception until June 20, 2021 for peer-reviewed articles published in English, reporting quantitative data on psychosocial outcomes among parents/caregivers, siblings, or family system. Instrument characteristics and psychometrics were extracted, and adapted COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria were applied to assess instrument quality. Descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis were used for analysis. Results Overall, 108 articles reporting on 107 distinct samples across 26 countries met inclusion. Across those articles, 40 instruments assessed psychological functioning or distress, 12 assessed coping, 11 assessed quality of life constructs, 10 assessed parenting stress/caregiver burden, 10 assessed family functioning/impact, 10 assessed stress appraisal, 5 assessed sibling psychosocial outcomes, and 2 assessed couple relationship satisfaction/strain. Applying COSMIN criteria to available data on original instrument development articles/manuals for English language instruments (n = 54), 67% scored a positive property evidence rating for content validity, 39% for internal consistency, 4% for test–retest reliability, and 9% for responsiveness (longitudinal validity). Conclusions Studies vary widely in instruments used to assess psychosocial adaptation and outcomes among families of children with CHD. Instrument selection informed by robust key psychometrics, increased psychometric reporting, development of both a “toolkit” approach and a comprehensive CHD-specific family instrument are among key recommendations.