Abstract
Abstract
This paper experimentally evaluates the relative importance of psychic costs of tetanus vaccination compared to monetary costs among women in rural Nigeria. We compare vaccine take-up between two conditions to receive cash incentives: clinic attendance vs. vaccine take-up. Because the only difference between these two conditions is whether a woman was required to receive a vaccine upon arrival at the clinic, the difference in clinic attendance between these two groups captures the psychic costs of vaccination. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find no evidence for significant psychic costs. Priming about disease severity increases the perceived severity of disease, but not vaccine take-up. Monetary costs strongly affect vaccination decisions.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Development,Accounting
Reference36 articles.
1. Improving Immunization Coverage in Rural India: A Clustered Randomized Controlled Evaluation of Immunization Campaigns with and without Incentives;Banerjee;British Medical Journal,2010
2. Eradicating Disease: The Effect of Conditional Cash Transfers on Vaccination Coverage in Rural Nicaragua;Barham;Journal of Health Economics,2009
3. Tetanus Toxoid Immunization to Reduce Mortality from Neonatal Tetanus;Blencowe;International Journal of Epidemiology,2010
4. The Global Value of Vaccination;Ehreth;Vaccine,2003
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献