Patterns of Democracy over Space and Time

Author:

Boese Vanessa Alexandra12ORCID,Gates Scott34ORCID,Knutsen Carl Henrik34ORCID,Nygård Håvard Mokleiv4ORCID,Strand Håvard34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Gothenburg , Sweden

2. WZB Berlin Social Science Center , Germany

3. University of Oslo , Norway

4. Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) , Norway

Abstract

Abstract Unidimensional measures of democracy fail to account for the complex and varied nature of political systems. This article disaggregates the concept of democracy and proposes a multidimensional conceptualization to account for this variation in institutional configurations. Three theoretically informed dimensions are featured: participation, electoral contestation, and constraints on the executive. The three dimensions constitute a cube covering all regime types, in which we place countries using V-Dem data from 1789 to 2019. This cube of democracy patterns reveals several interesting observations. We trace historical patterns of democratization and discuss how countries across the world have taken different paths at different times. Our conceptualization shows that political systems with a similar score along a unidimensional scale are often quite distinct. In addition, across the globe for 200 years, certain configurations of political institutions rarely occur. Furthermore, our approach reveals interesting patterns of regime convergence and divergence over time. Finally, we show that the typical pathways to democracy have changed since 1789. This multidimensional conceptualization ultimately opens up new avenues for research in which institutional variation and change can be studied in greater detail.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference42 articles.

1. Democracy Does Cause Growth;Acemoglu;Journal of Political Economy,2019

2. New Graphic Schemes for Stata: Plotplain and Plottig;Bischof;The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata,2017

3. Contestation and Participation: Concepts, Measurement, and Inference;Boese;International Area Studies Review

4. How (Not) to Measure Democracy;Boese;International Area Studies Review,2019

5. Patterns of Authoritarianism since 1900.;Boese,2021

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3