Affiliation:
1. New York University , USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Over the past decade, a growing literature has re-examined the relationship between material scarcity and conflict. Despite increasing policy salience and empirical interest, coherent theoretical accounts remain underdeveloped. This article develops microfoundations for a first-image rationalist explanation for war. It is shown that the basic physiological fact of necessary consumption induces context conditional risk preference, a feature that coherently explains empirical patterns of conflict. When applied to higher levels of analysis, the basic mechanism explains additional patterns such as the association between power preponderance and conflict and the oversized demands made by weak actors.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference105 articles.
1. Population and Conflict;Acemoglu;The Review of Economic Studies,2020
2. Climatic Stress, Internal Migration, and Syrian Civil War Onset;Ash;Journal of Conflict Resolution,2020
3. Land-Use Change and Communal Conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa;Balestri;Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy,2017
4. The Two Poverties;Banarjee;Nordic Journal of Political Economy,2001
5. Drought, Dams, and Survival: Linking Water to Conflict and Cooperation in Syria's Civil War;Beck;International Affairs Forum,2014