Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Nicotine Salt and Free-Base Using an E-cigarette: A Randomized Crossover Study

Author:

Christen Samuel E12ORCID,Hermann Laura1,Bekka Elias1ORCID,Vonwyl Celina12,Hammann Felix1ORCID,van der Velpen Vera13ORCID,Eap Chin B4567ORCID,Benowitz Neal L8ORCID,Haschke Manuel13ORCID,Liakoni Evangelia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern , Bern ,  Switzerland

2. Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern , Bern ,  Switzerland

3. Institute of Pharmacology, University of Bern , Bern ,  Switzerland

4. Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne , Prilly , Switzerland

5. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne , Geneva , Switzerland

6. Center for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Lausanne , Lausanne , Switzerland

7. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne , Lausanne , Switzerland

8. Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Popular “pod-style” e-cigarettes commonly use nicotine salt-based e-liquids that cause less irritation when inhaled and can deliver higher nicotine concentrations than free-base nicotine. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of different nicotine formulations (salt vs. free-base) and concentrations that might influence systemic nicotine absorption and appeal of e-cigarettes. Aims and Methods In this randomized, double-blind, within-subject crossover study, 20 non-nicotine-naïve participants were switched among three e-liquids (free-base nicotine 20 mg/mL, nicotine salt 20 mg/mL, nicotine salt 40 mg/mL) using a refillable pod system and a standardized vaping protocol (one puff every 30 seconds, 10 puffs total). Serum nicotine concentrations and vital signs were assessed over 180 minutes; direct effects, craving, satisfaction, withdrawal, and respiratory symptoms were measured using questionnaires. CYP2A6 genotypes and the nicotine metabolite ratio were also assessed. Results Eleven (55%) participants were male and the median age was 23.5 years (range 18–67). All three formulations differed significantly in peak serum nicotine concentration (baseline adjusted Cmax, median (range): 12.0 ng/mL (1.6–27.3), 5.4 ng/mL (1.9–18.7), and 3.0 ng/mL (1.3–8.8) for nicotine salt 40 mg/mL, nicotine salt 20 mg/mL and free-base 20 mg/mL, respectively). All groups reached Cmax 2.0–2.5 minutes (median) after their last puff. Differences in subjective effects were not statistically significant. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions Free-base 20 mg/mL formulations achieved lower blood nicotine concentrations than nicotine salt 20 mg/mL, while 40 mg/mL nicotine salt yielded concentrations similar to cigarette smoking. The findings can inform regulatory policy regarding e-liquids and their potential use in smoking cessation. Implications Nicotine salt formulations inhaled by an e-cigarette led to higher nicotine delivery compared to nicotine-free-base formulations with the same nicotine concentration. These findings should be considered in future regulatory discussions. The 40 mg/mL nicotine salt formulation showed similar nicotine delivery as combustible cigarettes, albeit at concentrations over the maximum limit for e-liquids allowed in the European Union. Nicotine delivery resembling combustible cigarettes might be beneficial for smokers willing to quit to adequately alleviate withdrawal symptoms. However, increased nicotine delivery can also pose a public health risk, raising concerns about abuse liability, especially among youth and nonsmokers.

Funder

Department of Teaching and Research

Insel Gruppe AG

University Hospital Bern

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference57 articles.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3