Concurrent E-cigarette Use While Enrolled in a Smoking Cessation Program: Associations Between Frequency of Use, Motives for Use, and Smoking Cessation

Author:

Iturralde Kameron12ORCID,Veldhuizen Scott13ORCID,Selby Peter1345ORCID,Zawertailo Laurie12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. INTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health , Toronto, Ontario , Canada

2. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada

3. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada

4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada

5. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Trial evidence suggests that e-cigarettes may aid in quitting smoking, while observational studies have found conflicting results. However, many observational studies have not adjusted for important differences between e-cigarette users and non-users. Aims and Methods We aimed to determine the association between e-cigarette use frequency and motivation to use e-cigarettes to quit smoking, and smoking cessation using data from Canada’s largest smoking cessation program. Participants who completed a baseline assessment and 6-month follow-up questionnaire were divided post hoc into four groups based on their self-reported e-cigarette use during the 30 days before baseline: (1) non-users; (2) users of e-cigarettes not containing nicotine; (3) occasional users; and (4) frequent users. Occasional and frequent users were further divided into two groups based on whether they reported using e-cigarettes to quit smoking. Abstinence at 6-month follow-up (7-day point prevalence abstinence) was compared among groups. Results Adjusted quit probabilities were significantly higher (both p < .001) for frequent baseline e-cigarette users (31.6%; 95% CI = 29.3%, 33.8%) than for non-users (25.8%; 25.3% and 26.3%) or occasional users (24.2%; 22.5% and 26.0%). Unadjusted proportions favored non-users over occasional users (p < .001), but this was not significant after adjustment (p = .06). People using e-cigarettes to quit smoking were not likelier than other users to be successful, but were likelier to report frequent e-cigarette use during follow-up. Conclusions Frequent baseline e-cigarette use predicted successful smoking cessation, compared to occasional and non-users. Use of e-cigarettes to quit did not predict smoking cessation but was associated with continued use during follow-up, perhaps due in part to planned transitions to e-cigarettes. Implications Prior observational studies investigating e-cigarette use for smoking cessation have found that occasional users have poorer outcomes than either frequent or non-users. Consistent with these studies, occasional users in our data also had poorer outcomes. However, after adjustment for variables associated with cessation success, we found that cessation probabilities did not differ between occasional and non-users. These findings are consistent with trial data showing the benefit of e-cigarette use among people trying to quit smoking. Results of this study suggest that differences between trials and previous observational studies may be because of unaddressed confounding in the latter.

Funder

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference45 articles.

1. Nicotine pharmacokinetics of electronic cigarettes: a review of the literature;Fearon;Regul Toxicol Pharmacol.,2018

2. E-cigarette use in adults: a qualitative study of users’ perceptions and future use intentions;Simmons;Addict Res Theory,2016

3. The unique contribution of e-cigarettes for tobacco harm reduction in supporting smoking relapse prevention;Notley;Harm Reduct J.,2018

4. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation;Hartmann-Boyce;Cochrane Database Syst Rev.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3