Affiliation:
1. MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow , Glasgow , UK
2. School of Social Work and Social Policy, University of Strathclyde , Glasgow , UK
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
To estimate the effect of social media use in 14 year olds on risk of and inequalities in cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use at 17 years, using the UK-representative Millennium Cohort Study (born 2000–2002).
Aims and Methods
The relationship of time spent on social media (using questionnaires [n = 8987] and time-use-diaries [n = 2520]) with cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use was estimated using adjusted odds ratios (AORs) or relative risk ratios (ARRRs). Effect modification was examined (using parental education as an indicator for socioeconomic circumstances) by comparing adjusted risk differences within low and high-parental education groups. Analyses accounted for prespecified confounders (identified via directed acyclic graphs), baseline outcome measures (to address reverse causality), sample design, attrition, and item-missingness (through multiple imputation).
Results
Time spent on social media was associated with increased risk of cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use in a dose–response manner. Social media use for ≥2 hours/day (vs. 1–<30 minutes) was associated with increased cigarette (AOR 2.76 [95% confidence interval 2.19 to 3.48]), e-cigarette (3.24 [2.59 to 4.05]), and dual use (ARRR 4.11 [2.77 to 6.08]). The risk of cigarette use among 30 minutes–<1 hour/day users (vs. non-users) were smaller in those with high versus low parental education (ARDs 1.4% vs. 12.4%). Similar findings were observed across the higher time categories. Analyses using time-use-diaries, in complete case samples, and with additional adjustment for baseline outcome measures generally revealed similar findings.
Conclusions
After accounting for observed confounders and potential reverse causality, findings suggest social media use increases the risk of cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use in a dose–response manner. Guidance addressing adolescent online safety should be prioritized.
Implications
This study’s identification of a dose–response relationship and differential effects across socioeconomic groups, could assist in the development of guidance on time spent on social media. The adverse effects of social media use on adolescent cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use supports legislation aimed at promoting adolescent online safety. Study findings strengthen calls to prohibit social media marketing of nicotine-related products and importantly highlight the need to increase awareness and understanding of the underlying algorithms which drive adolescent exposure to nicotine-related content on social media to ensure they are functioning in a way that best serves the adolescent population.
Funder
Medical Research Council
Chief Scientist Office
Wellcome Trust
U.S. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference50 articles.
1. Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and initiation among young people in 204 countries and territories,1990-2019;Reitsma;Lancet Public Health,2021
2. COVID-19, smoking and inequalities: a study of 53,002 adults in the UK;Jackson;Tob Control.,2021
3. Smoking and inequalities;Marmot;Lancet.,2006
4. Is adolescent e-cigarette use associated with smoking in the United Kingdom?: a systematic review with meta-analysis;Aledeokin;Tob Prev Cessat,2019
5. Association between electronic cigarette use and tobacco cigarette smoking initiation in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis;O’Brien;BMC Public Health,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献