Risk assessment in the 21st century: where are we heading?

Author:

Brescia Susy1ORCID,Alexander-White Camilla2,Li Hequn3,Cayley Alex4

Affiliation:

1. Health & Safety Executive , Chemicals Regulation Division, Redgrave Court, Merton Road, Bootle, Merseyside L20 7HS , UK

2. MKTox & Co Ltd, c/o LB Group, 80 Compair Crescent, Ipswich , Suffolk IP2 0EH , UK

3. Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook Unilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, , Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ , UK

4. Lhasa Limited, Granary Wharf House, 2 Canal Wharf , Leeds LS11, 5PS , UK

Abstract

AbstractReliance on animal tests for chemical safety assessment is increasingly being challenged, not only because of ethical reasons, but also because they procrastinate regulatory decisions and because of concerns over the transferability of results to humans. New approach methodologies (NAMs) need to be fit for purpose and new thinking is required to reconsider chemical legislation, validation of NAMs and opportunities to move away from animal tests. This article summarizes the presentations from a symposium at the 2022 Annual Congress of the British Toxicology Society on the topic of the future of chemical risk assessment in the 21st century. The symposium included three case-studies where NAMs have been used in safety assessments. The first case illustrated how read-across augmented with some in vitro tests could be used reliably to perform the risk assessment of analogues lacking data. The second case showed how specific bioactivity assays could identify an NAM point of departure (PoD) and how this could be translated through physiologically based kinetic modelling in an in vivo PoD for the risk assessment. The third case showed how adverse-outcome pathway (AOP) information, including molecular-initiating event and key events with their underlying data, established for certain chemicals could be used to produce an in silico model that is able to associate chemical features of an unstudied substance with specific AOPs or AOP networks. The manuscript presents the discussions that took place regarding the limitations and benefits of these new approaches, and what are the barriers and the opportunities for their increased use in regulatory decision making.

Funder

Cosmetics Europe

Health and Safety Executive

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology

Reference65 articles.

1. Strategic plan to promote the development and implementation of alternative test methods within the TSCA program;EPA (Environmental Protection Agency),2018

2. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: progress in the past decade and future perspectives;Krewski;Arch Toxicol,2020

3. Points of references in the validation process;Hoffmann;Altern Lab Anim,2008

4. Mom-animal methods to predict skin sensitisation (I): the Cosmetic Europe database;Hoffmann;Crit Rev Toxicol,2020

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3