Benefits do not balance costs of biological invasions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Benefits do not balance costs of biological invasions

Published:2024-03-01 Issue:5 Volume:74 Page:340-344
ISSN:0006-3568
Container-title:BioScience
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Carneiro Laís¹^ORCID,Hulme Philip E²^ORCID,Cuthbert Ross N³^ORCID,Kourantidou Melina⁴⁵^ORCID,Bang Alok⁶⁷⁸^ORCID,Haubrock Phillip J⁹¹⁰¹¹^ORCID,Bradshaw Corey J A¹²¹³^ORCID,Balzani Paride¹⁴^ORCID,Bacher Sven¹⁵^ORCID,Latombe Guillaume¹⁶^ORCID,Bodey Thomas W¹⁷^ORCID,Probert Anna F¹⁸^ORCID,Quilodrán Claudio S¹⁹^ORCID,Courchamp Franck²⁰^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory of Ecology and Conservation and with the Graduate Program in Ecology and Conservation at the Universidade Federal do Paraná , Curitiba , Brazil

2. Bioprotection Aotearoa, at Lincoln University , Lincoln Canterbury , New Zealand

3. Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences at the Queen's University Belfast , Belfast, Ireland , United Kingdom

4. Department of Sociology, Environmental, and Business Economics at the University of Southern Denmark , Esbjerg Ø , Denmark

5. Université de Bretagne Occidentale , Plouzané , France

6. School of Arts and Sciences at Azim Premji University , Bangalore , India

7. School of Arts and Sciences, Azim Premji University , Bhopal , India

8. Society for Ecology, Evolution, and Development , Wardha , India

9. Department of River Ecology and Conservation at the Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt , Gelnhausen , Germany

10. Center for Applied Mathematics and Bioinformatics, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, at the Gulf University for Science and Technology , Hawally , Kuwait

11. South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters at the University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice , Vodňany , Czech Republic

12. Global Ecology Laboratory, Partuyarta Ngadluku Wardli Kuu, at the College of Science and Engineering, at Flinders University , Adelaide , South Australia

13. ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage , Wollongong, New South Wales , Australia

14. South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters at the University of South Bohemia, in České Budějovice , Vodňany , Czech Republic

15. Department of Biology at the University of Fribourg , Fribourg , Switzerland

16. Institute of Ecology and Evolution at The University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, Scotland , United Kingdom

17. School of Biological Sciences at King's College, at the University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen, Scotland , United Kingdom

18. Zoology Discipline, School of Environmental and Rural Science, at the University of New England , Armidale , Australia

19. Department of Genetics and Evolution at the University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland

20. Université Paris–Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution , Gif-sur-Yvette , France

Abstract

Abstract Biological invasions have profound impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and services, resulting in substantial economic and health costs estimated in the trillions of dollars. Preventing and managing biological invasions are vital for sustainable development, aligning with the goals of the United Nations Biodiversity Conference. However, some invasive species also offer occasional benefits, leading to divergent perceptions among stakeholders and sectors. Claims that invasion science overlooks positive contributions threaten to hinder proper impact assessment and undermine management. Quantitatively balancing benefits and costs is misleading, because they coexist without offsetting each other. Any benefits also come at a price, affecting communities and regions differently over time. An integrated approach considering both costs and benefits is necessary for understanding and effective management of biological invasions.

Funder

CAPES

Leverhulme Trust

Australian Research Council

Swiss National Science Foundation

AXA Research Fund

CNRS

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Link

https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/biosci/biae010/58119999/biae010.pdf

Reference45 articles.

1. Managing biological invasions: The cost of inaction;Ahmed;Biological Invasions,2022

2. Recent advances in availability and synthesis of the economic costs of biological invasions;Ahmed;BioScience,2023

3. Impacts of Nile perch, Lates niloticus, introduction on the ecology, economy and conservation of Lake Victoria;Aloo;East Africa Lakes and Reservoirs: Science, Policy, and Management for Sustainable Use,2017

4. Bacher S . 2023. Impacts of invasive alien species on nature, nature's contributions to people, and good quality of life. Pages 1–157 in Roy HE , Pauchard A, Stoett P, Truong Renard T, eds. Thematic Assessment Report on Invasive Alien Species and Their Control of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7430731

5. Socio-economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT);Bacher;Methods in Ecology and Evolution,2018

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Harms of introduced large herbivores outweigh their benefits, while both are greater on islands and for higher trophic levels;2024-08-29

2. Mitigating the role of aquaculture in crustacean invasions;Reviews in Aquaculture;2024-07-25

3. Threatened stick-nest rats preferentially eat invasive boxthorn rather than native vegetation on Australia’s Reevesby Island;Wildlife Research;2024-07-25

4. Damage costs from invasive species exceed management expenditure in nations experiencing lower economic activity;Ecological Economics;2024-06