Management Foundations for Navigating Ecological Transformation by Resisting, Accepting, or Directing Social–Ecological Change

Author:

Magness Dawn R1ORCID,Hoang Linh2,Belote R Travis3,Brennan Jean4,Carr Wylie5,Stuart Chapin F6,Clifford Katherine7ORCID,Morrison Wendy8,Morton John M9,Sofaer Helen R10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, Soldotna, Alaska, United States

2. US Forest Service's Northern Region, Missoula, Montana, United States

3. The Wilderness Society, Bozeman, Montana, United States

4. USFWS and is now the climate adaptation coordinator for the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition, Three Rivers, California, United States

5. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States

6. University of Alaska's Institute of Arctic Biology, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States

7. US Geological Survey (USGS), Fort Collins, Colorado, United States

8. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries, Silver Springs, Maryland, United States

9. USFWS and is now vice president of the Alaska Wildlife Alliance, Anchorage, Alaska, United States

10. USGS Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Abstract

Abstract Despite striking global change, management to ensure healthy landscapes and sustained natural resources has tended to set objectives on the basis of the historical range of variability in stationary ecosystems. Many social–ecological systems are moving into novel conditions that can result in ecological transformation. We present four foundations to enable a transition to future-oriented conservation and management that increases capacity to manage change. The foundations are to identify plausible social–ecological trajectories, to apply upstream and deliberate engagement and decision-making with stakeholders, to formulate management pathways to desired futures, and to consider a portfolio approach to manage risk and account for multiple preferences across space and time. We use the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska as a case study to illustrate how the four foundations address common land management challenges for navigating transformation and deciding when, where, and how to resist, accept, or direct social–ecological change.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Reference138 articles.

1. Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world;Acreman;Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2014

2. Moving beyond the exchange value in the nonmarket valuation of ecosystem services;Allen;Ecosystem Services,2016

3. Optimal portfolio design to reduce climate-related conservation uncertainty in the prairie pothole region;Ando;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2012

4. A portfolio approach to managing ecological risks of global change;Aplet;Ecosystem Health and Sustainability,2017

5. Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of place: Lessons for environmental education;Ardoin;Canadian Journal of Environmental Education,2006

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3