Impact Indicators for Biodiversity Conservation Research: Measuring Influence within and beyond Academia

Author:

Lavery Tyrone H1ORCID,Morgain Rachel1,Fitzsimons James A2ORCID,Fluin Jennie3,Macgregor Nicholas A4,Robinson Natasha M1,Scheele Ben C1,Selwood Katherine E5,Spindler Rebecca6,Vuong Holly1,West Simon7,Wintle Brendan A8,Lindenmayer David B1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory of Australia

2. The Nature Conservancy and the School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

3. Government of South Australia, Department for Environment and Water, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

4. Parks Australia, located, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory of Australia and the Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom

5. Zoos Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

6. Bush Heritage Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

7. Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

8. School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Measuring, reporting, and forecasting research impact beyond academia has become increasingly important to demonstrate and understand real-world benefits. This is arguably most important in crisis disciplines such as medicine, environmental sustainability and biodiversity conservation, where application of new knowledge is urgently needed to improve health and environmental outcomes. Increasing focus on impact has prompted the development of theoretical guidance and practical tools tailored to a range of disciplines, but commensurate development of tools for conservation is still needed. In the present article, we review available tools for evaluating research impact applicable to conservation research. From these, and via a survey of conservation professionals, we compiled and ranked a list of 96 impact indicators useful for conservation science. Our indicators apply to a logic chain of inputs, processes, outputs, outcomes, and impacts. We suggest the list can act as a clear guide to realize and measure potential impacts from conservation research within and beyond academia.

Funder

Australian National University

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3