The ECO framework: advancing evidence-based science engagement within environmental research programs and organizations

Author:

Garlick Sarah1ORCID,Fallon Kathy2

Affiliation:

1. Senior Director of Science Engagement, Hubbard Brook Research Foundation , Thornton, New Hampshire , United States

2. Director of Land and Climate, Clean Air Task Force , Boston, Massachusetts , United States

Abstract

Abstract Despite widespread interest in science communication, public engagement with science, and engaged research, a large gap exists between the theories behind science engagement and how it is practiced within the scientific community. The scholarship of science engagement is also fractured, with knowledge and insights fragmented across discourses related to science communication, informal science learning, participatory research, and sustainability science. In the present article, we share a planning tool for integrating evidence and theory from these discourses into effective programs and projects. The ECO framework promotes three distinct and interacting modes of science engagement practice: formative engagement (listening and relationship building), codesign and coproduction (action-oriented partnerships), and broader outreach (expanding networks and dissemination). By planning engagement activities with attention to these three modes of engagement, scientists and scientific research organizations will be better poised to address urgent needs for stronger connections between science and society and increased use of scientific research in decision-making.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Reference59 articles.

1. Theory of Change for Public Engagement with Science;[AAAS] American Association for the Advancement of Science;Center for Public Engagement with Science and Technology,2016

2. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A Meta-analysis;Allum;Public Understanding of Science,2008

3. Editorial overview: The science of actionable knowledge;Arnott;Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2020

4. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda;Bauer;Public Understanding of Science,2007

5. Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: The practitioners’ perspectives;Bednarek;Sustainability Science,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3