Affiliation:
1. Senior Director of Science Engagement, Hubbard Brook Research Foundation , Thornton, New Hampshire , United States
2. Director of Land and Climate, Clean Air Task Force , Boston, Massachusetts , United States
Abstract
Abstract
Despite widespread interest in science communication, public engagement with science, and engaged research, a large gap exists between the theories behind science engagement and how it is practiced within the scientific community. The scholarship of science engagement is also fractured, with knowledge and insights fragmented across discourses related to science communication, informal science learning, participatory research, and sustainability science. In the present article, we share a planning tool for integrating evidence and theory from these discourses into effective programs and projects. The ECO framework promotes three distinct and interacting modes of science engagement practice: formative engagement (listening and relationship building), codesign and coproduction (action-oriented partnerships), and broader outreach (expanding networks and dissemination). By planning engagement activities with attention to these three modes of engagement, scientists and scientific research organizations will be better poised to address urgent needs for stronger connections between science and society and increased use of scientific research in decision-making.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference59 articles.
1. Theory of Change for Public Engagement with Science;[AAAS] American Association for the Advancement of Science;Center for Public Engagement with Science and Technology,2016
2. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A Meta-analysis;Allum;Public Understanding of Science,2008
3. Editorial overview: The science of actionable knowledge;Arnott;Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2020
4. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda;Bauer;Public Understanding of Science,2007
5. Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: The practitioners’ perspectives;Bednarek;Sustainability Science,2018
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献