Measuring Policy Diffusion in Federal Systems: The Case of Legalizing Cannabis in Canada under Time Constraints

Author:

Brie Evelyne1,Huo Cynthia1,Alcantara Christopher1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of Western Ontario , Canada

Abstract

Abstract Existing studies of policy diffusion rely on quantitative or qualitative methods depending on the number of cases and the policy at hand. Studies of diffusion in Canada, for instance, almost exclusively use qualitative techniques due to the limited number of subnational units. In this article, we explore whether machine learning techniques can complement qualitative approaches in these contexts. In 2015, the Canadian federal government decided to impose the legalization of cannabis and gave the provinces and territories a short time frame to develop and implement legislation. Previous qualitative research on this case found that within-province policy development was more salient than interprovincial diffusion. Using a plagiarism detection software, we find limited evidence of exact matches between provincial legislation, but a cosine score approach reveals significant similarities across provinces. These results suggest that computational and qualitative techniques together should be used where possible to identify and analyze policy diffusion in certain contexts.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference73 articles.

1. Old wine in new bottles?: Instrumental policy learning and the evolution of the certainty provision in comprehensive land claims agreements;Alcantara;Canadian Public Policy,2009

2. Preferences, perceptions, and veto players: Explaining devolution negotiation outcomes in the Canadian Territorial North;Alcantara;Polar Record,2013

3. Are the contents of international treaties copied and pasted? Evidence from preferential trade agreements;Allee;International Studies Quarterly,2019

4. The policy diffusion of environmental performance in the European countries;Arbolino;Ecological Indicators,2018

5. The lessons of learning;Bennett;Policy Sciences,1992

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3