Affiliation:
1. The University of Western Ontario , Canada
Abstract
Abstract
Existing studies of policy diffusion rely on quantitative or qualitative methods depending on the number of cases and the policy at hand. Studies of diffusion in Canada, for instance, almost exclusively use qualitative techniques due to the limited number of subnational units. In this article, we explore whether machine learning techniques can complement qualitative approaches in these contexts. In 2015, the Canadian federal government decided to impose the legalization of cannabis and gave the provinces and territories a short time frame to develop and implement legislation. Previous qualitative research on this case found that within-province policy development was more salient than interprovincial diffusion. Using a plagiarism detection software, we find limited evidence of exact matches between provincial legislation, but a cosine score approach reveals significant similarities across provinces. These results suggest that computational and qualitative techniques together should be used where possible to identify and analyze policy diffusion in certain contexts.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference73 articles.
1. Old wine in new bottles?: Instrumental policy learning and the evolution of the certainty provision in comprehensive land claims agreements;Alcantara;Canadian Public Policy,2009
2. Preferences, perceptions, and veto players: Explaining devolution negotiation outcomes in the Canadian Territorial North;Alcantara;Polar Record,2013
3. Are the contents of international treaties copied and pasted? Evidence from preferential trade agreements;Allee;International Studies Quarterly,2019
4. The policy diffusion of environmental performance in the European countries;Arbolino;Ecological Indicators,2018
5. The lessons of learning;Bennett;Policy Sciences,1992