Public Opinion, Federalism, and Level of Governmental Intervention: Perceptions of Law Enforcement Response to the 2020 George Floyd Protests

Author:

Kolcak Burcu1,McCabe Katherine T2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, Rutgers University , USA

2. Department of Political Science, Rutgers University , USA ; k.mccabe@rutgers.edu

Abstract

Abstract In June 2020, President Trump issued an executive order calling for the deployment of federal law enforcement agents to protests against police brutality. Several mayors across the country objected to this unilateral deployment of federal force as unconstitutional. In an online survey experiment, we test whether the public stands against this type of federal power aggrandizement by evaluating how approval of federal intervention in protests changes depending on whether it is requested by local mayors or directed by the presidential administration. The results show that the public is responsive to the level of government directing the action. Respondents are significantly less approving of the use of federal forces when it is directed by the federal executive branch. However, not all subgroups respond equally to the manipulation. The treatment effects vary significantly by respondent partisanship, trust in government, and perceptions of the importance of federalism.

Funder

Center for the Experimental Study of Politics and Psychology at Rutgers University

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference55 articles.

1. Does federalism weaken democratic representation in the United States?;Arceneaux;Publius: The Journal of Federalism,2005

2. The political science of federalism;Bednar;Annual Review of Law and Social Science,2011

3. Through the looking glass: Trump-era civil-military relations in comparative perspective;Brooks;Strategic Studies Quarterly,2021

4. Public preferences for Zika policy and responsibility in the absence of partisan cues;Connolly;Journal of Public Policy,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3