Affiliation:
1. Illinois State University , USA
Abstract
Abstract
With ever-increasing gridlock and polarization at the national level, many new policy changes in the United States have come at the state level. This includes legislation that restricts the right to vote, limits free speech and expression, and gerrymanders state legislative and congressional districts. A growing body of literature describes these changes, when taken together, as evidence of subnational democratic backsliding. Yet this literature largely ignores the effects of federalism on the structure of institutions within the states, particularly on judicial independence. In this article, I examine the relationship between measures of democracy and introduction of court-curbing legislation in the states. Focusing on instances of court packing, changing the methods of selection and retention, and impeachment, I show that heightened attacks on judicial independence are associated with other types of democratic backsliding.
Funder
National Science Foundation Law and Social Science Program
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference62 articles.
1. An events-based approach to understanding democratic erosion;Baron;PS: Political Science & Politics,2024
2. Curbing the Court
3. Court curbing in the state house: Why state legislators attack their courts;Blackley;Justice System Journal,2019
4. Judicial independence on unelected state supreme courts;Blake;Justice System Journal,2018
5. Mapping the ideological marketplace;Bonica;American Journal of Political Science,2014