Affiliation:
1. University of Missouri
Abstract
Abstract
Partisan and ideological polarization have been major barriers to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion in Republican-controlled states. Scholars have referred to this situation as “fractious federalism,” with Republican state policymakers toeing the national party line in refusing to cooperate with a major policy initiative. In some cases, however, diverse advocacy coalitions have overcome fractious federalism to pass expansion legislation in deeply Republican states. More recently, such coalitions have resorted to ballot initiative campaigns as another means of overcoming such polarization, and won impressive victories in a series of “deep red” states. Drawing on forty-four interviews with people involved in expansion advocacy in eleven states, I report important insights on the formation and activities of these coalitions in both the legislative and ballot initiative eras of Medicaid expansion politics.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference48 articles.
1. The politics of need: examining governors’ decisions to oppose the;Barrilleaux;“Obamacare” Medicaid Expansion. State Politics & Policy Quarterly,2014
2. Opinion: Amendment 2 not the Answer to Missouri’s Health Care Problems;Bohl;The Missouri Times,2020
3. Demanding Choices
4. Medicaid expansion in a litmus state: The Missouri struggle;Brasfield;Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law,2016
5. The Chamber’s Secrets;Brodwin;US News & World Report,2015
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献