Brexit and Territorial Preferences: Evidence from Scotland and Northern Ireland

Author:

Daniels Lesley-Ann1,Kuo Alexander2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals

2. University of Oxford

Abstract

Abstract Has the UK referendum to leave the EU (Brexit) affected territorial preferences within the UK? We draw on comparative theories of such preferences to address this question, as Brexit can be seen as a shock to a political unit. We test hypotheses in two key regions, Scotland and Northern Ireland, with original surveys fielded at a unique time (September 2019). We randomize making salient different Brexit scenarios and measure support for Scottish independence and unification with Ireland within each region. We find in Scotland the prospect of leaving the EU increases support for independence. This effect is pronounced among those who support the UK remaining in the EU. In Northern Ireland, religious background correlates highly with territorial views, and we find little evidence of Brexit or border-scenario effects. Our results contribute to the literature on decentralization processes and the EU, and provide evidence of when negative shocks affect such preferences.

Funder

Institute of Self-Government Studies

AXA Research Fund

American Political Science Association

University Association for Contemporary European Studies conferences

University of Oxford

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference46 articles.

1. Together or separately? Issues on the costs and benefits of political and fiscal unions;Alesina;European Economic Review,1995

2. How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers;Bansak;Science (New York, N.Y.),2016

3. The breakup of nations: A political economy analysis;Bolton;Quarterly Journal of Economics,1997

4. National identities and attitudes to constitutional change in post-devolution UK: A four territories comparison;Bond;Regional & Federal Studies,2010

5. Europeanization and secession: The cases of Catalonia and Scotland;Bourne;Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe,2014

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3