UK surrogates’ characteristics, experiences, and views on surrogacy law reform

Author:

Horsey Kirsty12ORCID,Arian-Schad Mimi2,Macklon Nicholas2,Ahuja Kamal2

Affiliation:

1. Kent Law School, University of Kent , Kent, UK

2. London Women’s Clinic , London, UK

Abstract

Abstract What are surrogates’ views on their experience with surrogacy, their understanding of the law, and views on legal reform? We conducted an online retrospective survey of women who underwent treatment as gestational surrogates in two UK-regulated IVF centres between March 2014 and October 2021. Forty-seven surrogates responded outlining their experiences with surrogacy in the England/Wales legal context, their understandings of the law, and thoughts on potential law reform. The surrogates ranged in age, occupation, and household income. Most surrogates were white, British women. While almost half were family members or friends of the intended parents, the largest category met the intended parents through a non-profit surrogacy organization. Two-thirds of the respondents had given birth to a baby as a surrogate. Surrogates generally do not view themselves as the mother of the child that they carry and support proposals for reforms that would recognize the intended parents as legal parents from birth. More ambivalence is apparent in relation to expenses and payments, though advertising is generally supported. Draft new legislation is expected to be introduced in the UK in 2023, and the results of this study could inform public and parliamentary debates to come in the UK and elsewhere. Moreover, the results from this survey can assist the development of good practice models for care on the surrogate pathway.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Surrogacy needs to be regulated, not prohibited;BMJ;2024-08-05

2. Legal parenthood in surrogacy: shifting the focus to the surrogate’s negative intention;Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law;2024-04-02

3. Registering births: What’s care got to do with it?;Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law;2024-04-02

4. Surrogacy in the UK;Journal of Health Visiting;2024-03-02

5. Surrogates’, intended parents’, and professionals’ perspectives on ways to improve access to surrogacy in Australia;International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family;2024-01-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3