Affiliation:
1. University of Macao
2. China University of Coimbra, Portugal
Abstract
Abstract
The events surrounding COVID-19, combined with the mandatory quarantines widely imposed in Asia and Europe since the virus outbreak, have reignited discussion of the balance between individual rights and liberties and public health during epidemics and pandemics. This article analyses this issue from the perspectives of precaution and necessity. There is a difficult relationship between these two seemingly opposite principles, both of which are frequently invoked in this domain. Although the precautionary principle (PP) encourages the use of quarantines, including mandatory quarantines, and associated restrictive measures, the principle of necessity (PN) puts a break on such measures. The COVID-19 pandemic reveals once again the different interrelations between these two principles. However, the alleged conflict between the PN and the PP is based on a superficial analysis. The relation between these two principles is far more complex, as this article will demonstrate.
Funder
University of Macau Multi-Year Research Grant
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference77 articles.
1. Machine Learning and Enculturation: Perspective of International Human Rights in China;IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSR JEN),2019
2. Constitutional Rights and Proportionality;Alexy;Revus [Online],2014
3. HIV/AIDS in Cuba: A Rights-Based Analysis;Anderson;Health and Human Rights,2009
4. Necessity and Least Infringement Conditions in Public Health Ethics;Allen;Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy,2017
5. Explaining Science-Led Policy-Making: Pandemic Deaths, Epistemic Deliberation and Ideational Trajectories;Baekkeskov;Policy Sciences,2016
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献