Test–Retest Reliability of a Static and Dynamic Motor Fatigability Protocol Using Grip and Pinch Strength in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Author:

Brauers Lieke12ORCID,Smeets Rob2,Feys Peter1,Gordon Andrew M3,van der Leij-Roelofsen Bertie4,Bastiaenen Caroline5,Rameckers Eugene627,Klingels Katrijn6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Centre, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University , Hasselt, Belgium

2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University , Maastricht, The Netherlands

3. Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University , New York, New York

4. Adelante Rehabilitation Centre, Paediatric Rehabilitation, Valkenburg , The Netherlands

5. Department of Epidemiology, Research Line: Function, Participation and Rehabilitation , CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

6. REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Centre, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences , Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium

7. Centre of Expertise, Adelante Rehabilitation Centre , Valkenburg, The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the test–retest reliability, measurement error, and interpretability of new motor fatigability outcomes of grip and pinch strength for children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP).MethodsMotor fatigability during grip and pinch strength was measured twice (within 48 hours) in both hands of 50 children (mean age = 11 years 2 months; 14, 31, and 5 children with Manual Ability Classification System levels I, II, and III, respectively) using a 30-second static and dynamic maximum exertion protocol. For static motor fatigability, the Static Fatigue Index (SFI) and mean force (Fmean) in the first (Fmean1) and last (Fmean3) 10 seconds were calculated. For dynamic motor fatigability, Fmean1, Fmean3, and the number of peaks in the first and last 10 seconds were calculated.ResultsFor static motor fatigability, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were moderate to high for Fmean1 and Fmean3 (0.56–0.88), and the SFI showed low to moderate reliability (ICC = 0.32–0.72). For dynamic motor fatigability, the ICCs were moderate to high for all outcomes (0.54–0.91). The standard error of measurement agreement and the smallest detectable difference agreement were large in all outcomes, except for the SFI in static motor fatigability. Details per age group are provided. In general, younger children (6–11 years old) showed lower reliability than older children (12–18 years old).ConclusionMost outcome measures for static and dynamic motor fatigability of grip and pinch strength show moderate to high reliability in children with UCP, indicating that these tests can be used reliably to investigate the presence of motor fatigability in UCP, especially in older children. Standard error of measurement agreement and smallest detectable difference agreement indicated that these outcome measures should be interpreted with caution when evaluating change.ImpactMost of the proposed outcome measures for static and dynamic motor fatigability of grip and pinch are reliable in children with UCP and can be used for discriminative purposes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference32 articles.

1. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe (SCPE);Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers;Dev Med Child Neurol,2000

2. Cerebral palsy: an overview;Gulati;Indian J Pediatr,2018

3. Upper limb impairments and their impact on activity measures in children with unilateral cerebral palsy;Klingels;Eur J Paediatr Neurol,2012

4. Arm hand skilled performance in cerebral palsy: activity preferences and their movement components;Lemmens;BMC Neurol,2014

5. Management of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy;Tilton;Semin Pediatr Neurol,2004

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3