Screening and Assessment of Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Providers

Author:

Fisher Mary Insana1ORCID,Cohn Joy C2,Harrington Shana E3ORCID,Lee Jeanette Q4,Malone Daniel5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Dayton , Dayton, Ohio, USA

2. Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia , Pennsylvania, USA

3. Exercise Science Department, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA

4. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California at San Francisco/San Francisco State University , San Francisco, California, USA

5. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado , Aurora, Colorado, USA

Abstract

Abstract Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common side effect of cancer treatment. Regular surveillance is recommended, but few clinical practice guidelines transparently assess study bias, quality, and clinical utility in deriving recommendations of screening and assessment methods. The purpose of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to provide recommendations for the screening and assessment of CRF for health care professions treating individuals with cancer. Following best practices for development of a CPG using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Statement and Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI) Guidelines Trust Scorecard, this CPG included a systematic search of the literature, quality assessment of included evidence, and stakeholder input from diverse health care fields to derive the final CPG. Ten screening and 15 assessment tools supported by 114 articles were reviewed. One screen (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Quality of Life Questionnaire–30 Core Questionnaire) and 3 assessments (Piper Fatigue Scale–Revised, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue, and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Fatigue-SF) received an A recommendation (“should be used in clinical practice”), and 1 screen and 5 assessments received a B recommendation (“may be used in clinical practice”). Health care providers have choice in determining appropriate screening and assessment tools to be used across the survivorship care continuum. The large number of tools available to screen for or assess CRF may result in a lack of comprehensive research evidence, leaving gaps in the body of evidence for measurement tools. More research into the responsiveness of these tools is needed in order to adopt their use as outcome measures.ImpactHealth care providers should screen for and assess CRF using one of the tools recommended by this CPG.

Funder

American Physical Therapy Association

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference134 articles.

1. National Cancer Institute;Cancer Statistics

2. Evidence report on the occurrence, assessment, and treatment of fatigue in cancer patients;Lawrence;J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr,2004

3. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cancer-related fatigue. National Comprehensive Cancer;Jankowski;Network,2022

4. Cancer-related fatigue--mechanisms, risk factors, and treatments;Bower;Nat Rev Clin Oncol,2014

5. Assessment of fatigue in cancer patients and community dwellers: validation study of the Filipino version of the brief fatigue inventory;Mendoza;Oncology,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3