Temporary Faecal Diversion for Refractory Perianal and/or Distal Colonic Crohn’s Disease in the Biologic Era: An Updated Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Author:

Jew Michael1,Meserve Joseph2,Eisenstein Samuel3ORCID,Jairath Vipul45ORCID,McCurdy Jeffrey67,Singh Siddharth28ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA , USA

2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA , USA

3. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA , USA

4. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University , London, ON , Canada

5. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University , London, ON , Canada

6. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, ON , Canada

7. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa, ON , Canada

8. Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims We evaluated short- and long-term outcomes of temporary faecal diversion [FD] for management of refractory Crohn’s disease [CD], focusing on outcomes in the biologic era. Methods Through a systematic literature review until March 15, 2023, we identified 33 studies [19 conducted in the biologic era] that evaluated 1578 patients with perianal and/or distal colonic CD who underwent temporary FD [with intent of restoring bowel continuity] and reported long-term outcomes [primary outcome: successful restoration of bowel continuity, defined as remaining ostomy-free after reconnection at a minimum of 6 months after diversion or at the end of follow-up]. We calculated pooled rates (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) using random effects meta-analysis, and examined factors associated with successful restoration of bowel continuity. Results Overall, 61% patients [95% CI, 52-68%; 50% in biologic era] experienced clinical improvement after FD. Stoma takedown was attempted in 34% patients [28–41%; 37% in biologic era], 6–18 months after diversion. Among patients where bowel restoration was attempted, 63% patients [54–71%] had successful restoration of bowel continuity, and 26% [20–34%] required re-diversion. Overall, 21% patients [17–27%; 24% in biologic era] who underwent FD were successfully restored; 34% patients [30–39%; 31% in biologic era] required proctectomy with permanent ostomy. On meta-regression, post-diversion biologic use and absence of proctitis was associated with successful bowel restoration after temporary FD in contemporary studies. Conclusion In the biologic era, temporary FD for refractory perianal and/or distal colonic CD improves symptoms in half the patients, and bowel continuity can be successfully restored in a quarter of patients.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Gastroenterology,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3