A Narrative Review of Intensive Group Tobacco Treatment: Clinical, Research, and US Policy Recommendations

Author:

Kotsen Chris1,Santorelli Melissa L2,Bloom Erika Litvin345ORCID,Goldstein Adam O6,Ripley-Moffitt Carol7,Steinberg Michael B8,Burke Michael V9,Foulds Jonathan10

Affiliation:

1. Tobacco Quitcenter, Lung Cancer Institute, Steeplechase Cancer Center, RWJ Barnabas Health, Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health University Hospital Somerset, Somerville, NJ

2. Community Health and Wellness Unit, New Jersey Department of Health, State of New Jersey, Trenton, NJ

3. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI

4. Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI

5. Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI

6. Tobacco Intervention Programs, Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

7. Nicotine Dependence Program, Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

8. Rutgers Tobacco Dependence Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ

9. Nicotine Dependence Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

10. Population Health and Cancer Control Program, Cancer Institute, College of Medicine, Penn State University, Hershey, PA

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Clinical practice guidelines recommend comprehensive treatment for tobacco dependence including pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions. Group counseling may deliver unique treatment aspects not available with other modalities. This manuscript provides a narrative review of group treatment outcomes from real-world practice settings and complements recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our primary goals were to determine whether group treatments delivered in these settings have yielded similar quit rates compared to individual treatment and to provide recommendations for best practices and policy. Methods Group treatment was defined as occurring in a clinical or workplace setting (ie, not provided as part of a research study), led by a professionally trained clinician, and offered weekly over several weeks. English language PubMed articles from January 2000 to July 2017 were searched to identify studies that included outcomes from both group and individual treatment offered in real-world settings. Additional data sources meeting our criteria were also included. Reports not using pharmacotherapy and research studies (eg, RCTs) were excluded. The primary outcome was short-term, carbon monoxide (CO)-validated point prevalence abstinence (4-week postquit date). Results The review included data from 11 observational studies. In all cases, group treatment(s) had higher 4-week CO-validated quit rates (range: 35.5%–67.3%) than individual treatment(s) (range: 18.6%–53.3%). Conclusions Best practice group treatments for tobacco dependence are generalizable from research to clinical settings and likely to be at least as effective as intensive individual treatment. The added advantages of efficiency and cost-effectiveness can be significant. Group treatment is feasible in various settings with good results. Implications A major barrier to achieving high rates of tobacco abstinence is under-utilization of evidence-based treatment interventions. This review demonstrates the effectiveness and utility of group treatment for tobacco dependence. Based on the available data described in this narrative review in conjunction with existing RCT data, group treatment for tobacco dependence should be established and available in all behavioral health and medical settings. Group tobacco treatment is now one of the mandated reimbursable tobacco treatment formats within the US health care system, creating enormous opportunities for widespread clinical reach. Finally, comprehensive worksite group programs can further extend impact.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3