Does ostracism/rejection impact self-disclosures? Examining the appeal of perceived social affordances after social threat

Author:

Grady Sara M1ORCID,Eden Allison2,Tamborini Ron2

Affiliation:

1. School of Communication, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH, USA

2. Department of Communication, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI, USA

Abstract

Abstract Two studies examine how experiencing a social need threat (ostracism and rejection) impacts subsequent preferences for self-disclosure to various digital audiences. Findings consider how contextual/situational factors like need threats may impact the appeal of two established perceived social affordances of media: personalization and privacy/visibility. Participants took part in a (bogus) social media activity to elicit feelings of inclusion/ostracization/rejection and then were asked about sharing their media preferences with various potential audiences. Results show that social need threats have no significant impact on privacy preferences but do affect preferences for sharing with some audiences and not others. Notably, ostracized and rejected participants show different patterns of preferences, suggesting these forms of social need threat may have distinct impacts on future self-disclosures. Implications for online relationship development and community building are considered in the discussion.

Funder

internal institutional funds at Michigan State University

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference61 articles.

1. A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot;Abelson;Psychological Bulletin,1985

2. Revealing only the superficial me: Exploring categorical self-disclosure online;Attrill;Computers in Human Behavior,2011

3. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation;Baumeister;Psychological Bulletin,1995

4. Dialectical contradictions in relationship development;Baxter;Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,1990

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3