Black-White disparities in colorectal cancer outcomes: a simulation study of screening benefit

Author:

Rutter Carolyn M1ORCID,Nascimento de Lima Pedro2ORCID,Maerzluft Christopher E1ORCID,May Folasade P345,Murphy Caitlin C6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research , Seattle, WA, USA

2. RAND Corporation , Arlington, VA, USA

3. Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) , Los Angeles, CA, USA

4. Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology , Los Angeles, CA, USA

5. UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA , Los Angeles, CA, USA

6. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health , Houston, TX, USA

Abstract

AbstractThe US Black population has higher colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates and worse CRC survival than the US White population, as well as historically lower rates of CRC screening. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results incidence rate data in people diagnosed between the ages of 20 and 45 years, before routine CRC screening is recommended, were analyzed to estimate temporal changes in CRC risk in Black and White populations. There was a rapid rise in rectal and distal colon cancer incidence in the White population but not the Black population, and little change in proximal colon cancer incidence for both groups. In 2014-2018, CRC incidence per 100 000 was 17.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.3 to 19.9) among Black individuals aged 40-44 years and 16.6 (95% CI = 15.6 to 17.6) among White individuals aged 40-44 years; 42.3% of CRCs diagnosed in Black patients were proximal colon cancer, and 41.1% of CRCs diagnosed in White patients were rectal cancer. Analyses used a race-specific microsimulation model to project screening benefits, based on life-years gained and lifetime reduction in CRC incidence, assuming these Black–White differences in CRC risk and location. The projected benefits of screening (via either colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical testing) were greater in the Black population, suggesting that observed Black–White differences in CRC incidence are not driven by differences in risk. Projected screening benefits were sensitive to survival assumptions made for Black populations. Building racial disparities in survival into the model reduced projected screening benefits, which can bias policy decisions.

Funder

National Cancer Institute as part of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network

Argonne Leadership Computing Facility

DOE Office of Science User Facility

National Cancer Institute

VA IIR Merit

UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research Ablon Scholars Program

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3