Abstract
When the Macedonians had conquered Greece, city-states continued to exist along-side the more powerful kingdoms, and were often forced to accommodate their policies to the wishes of the powerful kings who were, in theory, their allies. If kings and cities were to co-operate effectively, there would need to be some way of adapting the authority of royal wishes to the theoretical rights of the cities to self-determination.The contrast between the powers of a king, theoretically all-powerful within his kingdom, and the autonomy of a city did not need to be total. Aristotle, who was acquainted with the Macedonian kingdom, made a clear distinction between kingship and tyranny, between rule by the law and autocracy. He listed Macedonia alongside Sparta and Epirus as kingdoms which were ruled in the interests of all.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,History,Classics
Reference29 articles.
1. Spuren politischer Autonomie in Aegypten unter den Ptolemäern
2. Philip V, Aratus and the “Conspiracy of Apelles;Errington;Historia,1967
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Politikoi Nomoi Again;Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung;2024-06-01
2. Bibliography;A Companion to Ancient Greek Government;2013-01-23
3. Les sénateurs comme miroirs du prince;Transferts culturels et droits dans le monde grec et hellénistique;2012