Self-assessment of Competence in Endoscopy: Challenges and Insights

Author:

Scaffidi Michael A12ORCID,Khan Rishad23,Grover Samir C24,Gimpaya Nikko2,Walsh Catharine M567

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

2. Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

3. Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada

4. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

5. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the Research and Learning Institutes, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

6. Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

7. The Wilson Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background Endoscopists use self-assessment to monitor the development and maintenance of their skills. The accuracy of these self-assessments, which reflects how closely one’s own rating corresponds to an external rating, is unclear. Methods In this narrative review, we critically examine the current literature on self-assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy with the aim of informing training and practice and identifying opportunities to improve the methodological rigor of future studies. Results In the seven included studies, the evidence regarding self-assessment accuracy was mixed. When stratified by experience level, however, novice endoscopists were least accurate in their self-assessments and tended to overestimate their performance. Studies examining the utility of video-based interventions using observation of expert benchmark performances show promise as a mechanism to improve self-assessment accuracy among novices. Conclusions Based on the results of this review, we highlight problematic areas, identify opportunities to improve the methodological rigor of future studies on endoscopic self-assessment and outline potential avenues for further exploration.

Funder

Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program

Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3