The effect and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer

Author:

Watanabe Hiromi1,Kubo Toshio2ORCID,Ninomiya Kiichiro1,Kudo Kenichiro3,Minami Daisuke4,Murakami Etsuko5,Ochi Nobuaki6,Ninomiya Takashi17,Harada Daijiro8,Yasugi Masayuki9,Ichihara Eiki1,Ohashi Kadoaki1,Fujiwara Keiichi4,Hotta Katsuyuki110,Tabata Masahiro2,Maeda Yoshinobu11,Kiura Katsuyuki1

Affiliation:

1. Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan

2. Center for Clinical Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan

3. Respiratory Medicine, Iwakuni Medical Center, Iwakuni, Japan

4. Respiratory Medicine, Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan

5. Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Japan

6. General Internal Medicine 4, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan

7. Health Service Center, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan

8. Respiratory Medicine, Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan

9. Respiratory Medicine, Chugoku Central Hospital, Fukuyama, Japan

10. Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan

11. Hematology and Oncology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated long survival for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the effect and safety of ICI rechallenge have not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ICI rechallenge in NSCLC patients. Methods We defined ‘rechallenge’ as re-administration of ICIs for patients who were previously treated with ICIs and discontinued treatment for any reason, and received subsequent chemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed the histories of 434 patients with advanced NSCLC who received ICIs from December 2015 to December 2017 at seven centers. Results A total of 317 patients discontinued the ICI treatment, and 14 patients (4.4%) received ICI rechallenge. All 14 patients discontinued the first ICI due to disease progression. Eight patients received the same kind of ICIs, and six patients received different ICIs. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8–2.6] and 6.5 months [95% CI: 1.4–19.0], respectively. The objective response rate was 7.1%, and the disease control rate was 21.4%. Two of three patients who achieved at least a stable disease, received radiotherapy between the first and second ICIs. Adverse events were not significantly different compared with the first ICIs. Conclusions In this study, the effect of ICI rechallenge was limited. Careful consideration of the administration of ICI rechallenge is necessary. This report involved a small number of cases, so further large prospective studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy of ICI rechallenge and to investigate predictive markers to identify a patient population in which ICI rechallenge is effective.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3