Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma: analysis of Japanese patients in CheckMate 214 with extended follow-up

Author:

Tomita Yoshihiko12,Kondo Tsunenori3,Kimura Go4,Inoue Takamitsu5,Wakumoto Yoshiaki6,Yao Masahiro7,Sugiyama Takayuki8,Oya Mototsugu9,Fujii Yasuhisa10,Obara Wataru11,Motzer Robert J12,Uemura Hirotsugu13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan

2. Department of Urology, Yamagata University Hospital, Yamagata, Japan

3. Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

4. Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

5. Department of Urology, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Japan

6. Department of Urology, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

7. Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

8. Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan

9. Department of Urology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

10. Department of Surgery, Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, University Hospital of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

11. Department of Urology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Morioka, Japan

12. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA

13. Department of Urology, Kinki University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Background Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) demonstrated superior efficacy over sunitinib (SUN) for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214, with a manageable safety profile. We report efficacy and safety with extended follow-up amongst Japanese patients. Methods CheckMate 214 patients received NIVO (3 mg/kg) plus IPI (1 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for four doses, then NIVO (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks; or SUN (50 mg) once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). This subgroup analysis assessed overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate/poor-risk and intent-to-treat (ITT) patients and safety (ITT patients). Results Of 550 and 546 patients randomized to NIVO+IPI and SUN, 38 and 34, respectively, were Japanese. Of these, 31 (NIVO+IPI) and 29 (SUN) patients were IMDC intermediate/poor-risk. In IMDC intermediate/poor-risk patients with 30 months’ minimum follow-up, there was a delayed trend in OS benefit with NIVO+IPI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19–1.59; P = 0.2670), and 24-month OS probability favoured NIVO+IPI (84%) versus SUN (76%). The ORR was 39% with NIVO+IPI and 31% with SUN (P = 0.6968). PFS was similar in both treatment arms (HR 1.17; 95% CI: 0.62–2.20; P = 0.6220). Efficacy in ITT patients was similar to IMDC intermediate/poor-risk patients. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event incidence was lower with NIVO+IPI versus SUN (58 versus 91%). Conclusions Japanese patients with untreated aRCC in the NIVO+IPI arm had a numerically higher ORR and improved safety profile versus patients in the SUN arm. A delayed OS benefit appears to be emerging with NIVO+IPI. Longer follow-up is needed. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02231749?term=NCT02231749&rank=1 identifier: NCT02231749.

Funder

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

ONO Pharmaceutical Company Ltd

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3