Risk of death, major adverse cardiac events and relapse in patients with bullous pemphigoid treated with systemic or topical corticosteroids

Author:

Kridin Khalaf123ORCID,Bieber Katja1,Vorobyev Artem4,Moderegger Eva Lotta4,Hernandez Gema56,Schmidt Enno14ORCID,Ludwig Ralf J14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck , Lübeck , Germany

2. Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University , Safed , Israel

3. Unit of Dermatology and Skin Research Laboratory, Barch Padeh Medical Center , Poriya , Israel

4. Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck , Lübeck , Germany

5. TriNetX, LLC , Cambridge, MA , USA

6. Biomedical Informatics Group, Artificial Intelligence Department, E.T.S.I. Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid , Madrid , Spain

Abstract

Abstract Background According to current guidelines, systemic or topical corticosteroids are both recommended as first-line treatments for bullous pemphigoid (BP). There is evidence to suggest that topical application may be associated with a lower risk of mortality. However, there is a lack of comprehensive large-scale data comparing mortality rates, as well as the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), infections and relapse, between systemic and topical corticosteroid treatments. Objectives To evaluate the risk of death, MACE, infections and relapse in patients with BP treated with systemic or topical corticosteroids. Methods A population-based retrospective cohort study was performed using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. As a measure against bias, propensity score matching for age, sex, 10 diseases and 6 medications was done, and 3 sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results All-time risk of death was increased in US patients with BP exposed to any dose of systemic corticosteroids (n = 2917) vs. patients treated with topical clobetasol propionate [n = 2932; hazard ratio (HR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28–1.58 (P < 0.001)]. This was consistent in time-stratified analysis (1- and 3-year mortality rates) and in analysis contrasting prednisone (equivalent) doses of 1–10 mg (low) or 30–100 mg (medium–high) systemic corticosteroid to topical treatment. The increased risk of death in US patients with BP exposed to any dose of systemic corticosteroids vs. topical treatment was accompanied by increased risks for MACE (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.08–1.64; P = 0.008) and infections (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15–1.54; P < 0.001). The risk of continued disease or relapse was decreased in patients treated with systemic vs. topical corticosteroids (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77–0.94; P = 0.002). Results regarding mortality and continued disease or relapse persisted in three sensitivity analyses. Potential limitations included the retrospective data collection, bias for treatment selection and miscoding. Conclusions Pending validation in prospective studies, where feasible – and despite the heightened risk of relapse – topical corticosteroid treatment may be advantageous over systemic corticosteroid treatment owing to its significantly lower risk of death.

Funder

Cluster of Excellence

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3