Stigma in vitiligo: associated factors and severity strata of the Patient Unique Stigmatization Holistic tool in Dermatology (PUSH-D) score

Author:

Fakih Ali1,Tannous Rim2,Lajnef Mohamed3,Seneschal Julien4,Andreu Nicolas4,Tran Viet-Thi56,Ezzedine Khaled27ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Nord, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Université Jean Monnet , Saint Etienne , France

2. Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne-Université Paris , Paris , France

3. Inserm U955 IMRB, Translational Neuropsychiatry Laboratory and Paris-Est Créteil University , Créteil , France

4. Department of Dermatology, National Reference Center for Rare Skin Disorders, Hôpital Saint André, Bordeaux , France

5. Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital (AP-HP) , Paris , France

6. Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistiques (CRESS), Université de Paris , INSERM UMR1153, Paris , France

7. EpidermE, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC) , Créteil , France

Abstract

Abstract Background Vitiligo is the most common cause of skin depigmentation worldwide. Patients with vitiligo may experience stigma and this needs to be addressed. Objectives To evaluate stigma in patients with vitiligo, search for associated factors and establish severity strata for the Patient Unique Stigmatization Holistic tool in Dermatology (PUSH-D) for patients with vitiligo. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study in ComPaRe Vitiligo, an e-cohort of adult patients with vitiligo. Stigmatization was assessed using the PUSH-D, a recently validated dermatology-specific stigmatization assessment tool. We conducted univariate and multivariable linear regression to identify patient and disease factors associated with the stigmatization. We used an anchor-based approach to define severity strata for the PUSH-D. Results In total, 318 patients participated (mean age 49.7 years; 73.9% women). Fitzpatrick skin phototype IV–VI, severe facial involvement (high Self-Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score of the face) and depression (high Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score) were positively ­associated with a higher stigmatization score, although this association was weak [r = 0.24 (P < 0.001) and r = 0.30 (P < 0.001), respectively]. PUSH-D cutoff values that best discriminated patients with high and low stigma, as defined by the anchor question, were 13 and 23 (κ = 0.622, 95% confidence interval 0.53–0.71). Conclusions Our study is the first to use a skin-specific stigmatization tool to assess stigma in patients with vitiligo. Creating strata helps to better interpret the PUSH-D in daily practice and may facilitate its use in clinical trials.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference38 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3