Affiliation:
1. Smith School of Business at Queen’s University
2. LBS, CEPR, and ECGI
3. LSE
Abstract
Abstract
The informativeness principle states that a contract should depend on informative signals. This paper studies how it should do so. Signals indicating that the output distribution has shifted to the left (e.g., weak industry performance) reduce the threshold for the manager to be paid; those indicating that output is a precise measure of effort (e.g., low volatility) decrease high thresholds and increase low thresholds. Surprisingly, “good” signals of performance need not reduce the threshold. Applying our model to performance-based vesting, we show that performance measures should affect the strike price, rather than the number of vesting options, contrary to practice.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference54 articles.
1. On the optimality of resetting executive stock options;Acharya,;Journal of Financial Economics,2000
2. The other side of the trade-off: The impact of risk on executive compensation;Aggarwal,;Journal of Political Economy,1999
3. Skewness in stock returns: Reconciling the evidence on firm versus aggregate returns;Albuquerque,;Review of Financial Studies,2012
4. Measurement distortion and missing contingencies in optimal contracts;Allen,;Economic Theory,1992
5. Multiple signals, statistical sufficiency, and Pareto orderings of best agency contracts;Amershi,;RAND Journal of Economics,1989
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献