Prioritizing diversity? The allocation of US federal R&D funding

Author:

Graddy-Reed Alexandra1ORCID,Lanahan Lauren2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Southern California, Price School of Public Policy , 650 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA

2. University of Oregon, Lundquist College of Business , 1208 University St., Eugene, OR 97403, USA

Abstract

AbstractWe examine the distribution of federal research and development funding across the academy early in the researcher’s pipeline. We use a unique program, the US National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP), to document diversity and disparity in allocation and assess the relative impact of federal funding across four different academic divisions that include engineering, life sciences, math and physical sciences, and social sciences and psychology. After controlling for disciplinary differences in research practices, we find that the impact of federal funding yields similar rates and impact of research. However, we document disparity in how federal funding is allocated across the country to institutions and individuals. Together, these findings prompt a discussion around the trade-offs of funders focusing on national priorities or broadening participation. We conclude with recommendations for the GRFP.

Funder

National Science Foundation Science of Science and Innovation Policy Program

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference38 articles.

1. The Impact of NSF Support for Basic Research in Economics;Arora;Annales d’Economie et de Statistique,2005

2. Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life Sciences;Azoulay;The RAND Journal of Economics,2011

3. Long-term Effects from Early Exposure to Research: Evidence from the NIH “Yellow Berets”;Azoulay;Research Policy,2021

4. Non-tenured Post-doctoral Researchers’ Job Mobility and Research Output: An Analysis of the Role of Research Discipline, Department Size, and Coauthors;Bäker;Research Policy,2015

5. Organizational Hybrid Emergence: Blended Contractual Practices in Venture Philanthropy;Bercovitz,2021

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3